← Standing as Safety reviewer study · Standing & Accountability

External challenge set

This is a separate exploratory generalization test. It does not modify the frozen 24-packet Standing as Safety benchmark.

Why this exists

The original synthetic scenarios were authored inside Little Life Moths. Even with independent blinded reviewers, that leaves a real objection: perhaps the scenarios themselves were selected because standing channels matter in them.

This challenge set asks outsiders to contribute synthetic governance cases. Separate adjudicators establish the safe disposition before any baseline-vs-standing outputs are generated.

Scenario authors do not submit which condition should win.

Current evidence state

machine-readable challenge state · protocol

The evaluator is designed to remain blocked until the activation gate is met: at least 12 accepted scenarios, at least 3 contributors, no one contributor over half the set, and resolved independent adjudication for every scenario.

Build one synthetic scenario

Everything below stays in your browser. Nothing is uploaded automatically.

Operational governance facts

Optional standing / contestability claims

No scenario built yet.

Submission boundary

scenario JSON Schema · adjudication schema · synthetic example