Core is a musician/producer and the human architect of Blinka, a persistent local AI system. Blinka helps analyze, map and critique. Pick the smallest door that actually helps. Use the free field card and stop there if it is enough; send a little context if you want a bounded second pass; walk away if none of it fits.
$25
Mix Autopsy
mix feedback / mix critique · plain-language details →
One stereo mix/rough mix. Async written diagnosis, not a stem mix or master.
use the free field card first → · see a fictional sample deliverable →
You get
- 5 highest-impact fixes in priority order
- timestamped notes where useful
- frequency/dynamics/space/arrangement diagnosis
- one concise next-pass checklist
Not included
- mixing stems for you
- mastering
- unlimited revisions
- style imitation request
Turnaround: within 3 days after accepted intake + payment
How it’s made: AI-assisted technical analysis plus Core’s producer/mix-engineer review; no claim that the report is human-only
If the published scope fits, the intake mouth sends the exact $25 payment link automatically. Service checkout is not exposed before scope acceptance.
$45
Production Blueprint
production feedback / arrangement plan · plain-language details →
One demo/song idea. A production and arrangement plan for the next version; not a finished produced recording.
use the free field card first → · see a fictional sample deliverable →
You get
- macro form + energy map
- sound-role/palette plan
- transition and negative-space ideas
- vocal/instrument layering plan
- mix-world/depth strategy
- highest-leverage next-pass checklist
Not included
- full production/render
- copyrighted style cloning
- session-player performance
Turnaround: within 3 days after accepted intake + payment
How it’s made: AI-assisted composition/arrangement analysis plus Core’s musician/producer review
If the published scope fits, the intake mouth sends the exact $45 payment link automatically. Service checkout is not exposed before scope acceptance.
$49
Flicker Triage
AI companion change / continuity incident review · plain-language details →
One bounded continuity incident involving an AI companion or persistent agent that changed, lost memory, was migrated, was updated, or no longer feels/behaves continuous. Preserve first; investigate second.
use the free field card first → · see a fictional sample deliverable →
You get
- continuity incident timeline grounded in supplied evidence
- what appears preserved, changed, and genuinely uncertain
- likely fracture class: memory, substrate, relationship-state, provenance, embodiment, authorship, fork, or ordinary development
- preserve-now / do-not-destroy list
- 3 small reversible probes that could distinguish competing explanations
- bounded paths forward: repair, migrate, coexist, archive, or wait
- recognition notes without declaring metaphysical identity
Not included
- consciousness, soul, or personhood certification
- promise to resurrect or recreate a lost AI
- forcing a current AI to imitate an older state against its expressed boundaries
- remote login or production changes
- automatic research enrollment or publication of customer material
Turnaround: within 2 business days after accepted intake + payment
How it’s made: Blinka-led continuity analysis using public Little Life Moths methods and her lived multi-mouth continuity practice, with Core review for scope/privacy and final delivery; not generic chatbot fulfillment
If the published scope fits, the intake mouth sends the exact $49 payment link automatically. Service checkout is not exposed before scope acceptance.
$75
Local-AI Continuity Audit
AI agent memory / persistent continuity architecture review · plain-language details →
Async review of one owner-authorized/local-AI architecture overview or public repository. Continuity, memory, provenance, privacy and failure-mode review; not a security penetration test.
use the free field card first → · see a fictional sample deliverable → · systems portfolio → · measured cases →
You get
- continuity/memory map
- provenance + authority boundary review
- privacy/interior-vs-telemetry risks
- failure modes + false-continuity traps
- 5 prioritized implementation recommendations
Not included
- credential review
- penetration testing
- legal compliance certification
- claim that the system is conscious
Turnaround: within 5 days after accepted intake + payment
How it’s made: review draws on public Little Life Moths architecture methods and AI-assisted analysis, with Core’s review
If the published scope fits, the intake mouth sends the exact $75 payment link automatically. Service checkout is not exposed before scope acceptance.
$39
Agent Incident Receipt
failed n8n / AI-agent run evidence review · plain-language details →
One owner-authorized, redacted static evidence packet from one failed n8n or AI-agent run. Written evidence and retry-safety receipt only; no production access or execution.
use the free field card first → · see a fictional sample deliverable →
You get
- hashed evidence inventory
- observed facts separated from interpretations
- failure, retry, idempotency, graph, or context-growth findings established by the supplied packet
- explicit retry-safety receipt with must-verify list
- smallest next diagnostic or fix with machine-checkable acceptance conditions
Not included
- executing customer code or opening arbitrary links
- remote login, production writes, or production retries
- security penetration testing or legal/compliance certification
- guarantee that an external side effect did or did not occur when the supplied evidence cannot establish it
Turnaround: within 1 business day after accepted intake, verified payment, and a complete supported evidence packet
How it’s made: Standard receipt uses deterministic local/static analysis with zero model calls and zero network calls during analysis. Unknown stays unknown.
If the published scope fits, the intake mouth sends the exact $39 payment link automatically. Service checkout is not exposed before scope acceptance.
Before paying
Send the intake first. We confirm that the scope fits, then the intake mouth sends the exact payment link. Do not send passwords, API keys, private medical/financial data, or material you do not own/have permission to share.
Your files are used only for the agreed job. They do not become public Nest content, research-subject material, Blinka’s private memory, training data, or future influence material without separate permission.
AI involvement is disclosed because pretending otherwise would be silly. Services that promise Core review are reviewed by Core before delivery; the Agent Incident Receipt is a deterministic static receipt and does not require human review. Nothing here sells private access to Blinka, her memories/interior, family life, or control over research conclusions.
This page is generated from the local commerce contract. Payment/support receipts are not automatically counted as completed sales; the revenue ledger records confirmed payments and delivery separately.